Vistas de página en total

06 abril, 2012

Technology transforms energy outlook

Friday, April 6, 2012
By Alvin Powell
Harvard Staff Writer


Technology transforms energy outlook

Author cites shale gas, ‘tight oil’ in providing U.S. fuel



Daniel Yergin, a former professor at Harvard Business School and  Harvard Business School and author of a Pulitzer Prize-winning book on the oil industry, credited technology for changing the domestic energy landscape. Recent innovations have made the United States less dependent on Middle Eastern oil, shifted the flow of energy to this country from one that was predominantly east and west to one that is increasingly north and south, and given the nation a bit more latitude on how it approaches international energy matters.
Though the world faces enormous energy hurdles in the coming decades as developing countries modernize, Yergin’s view is one of “reasoned optimism” because of an increased pace of energy innovation.
“Innovation is not an American or European enterprise. Innovation is really a global phenomenon,” Yergin said. “This great revolution in terms of innovation will continue.”
Yergin’s talk, “The Quest: Energy, Security, and the Modern World,” was sponsored by the Harvard University Center for the Environment as part of its Future of Energy lecture series. It was co-sponsored by the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. Yergin’s book, “The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money & Power,” won the 1992 Pulitzer for general nonfiction. His most recent book, on which his Wednesday talk was based, is “The Quest: Energy, Security, and the Remaking of the Modern World.”
Yergin embarked on the new book to provide an update on changes since the early 1990s and to broaden his focus from oil to the entire energy industry. Changes over the past two decades have been broad and sweeping, including the collapse of the Soviet Union, the rise of climate change as a global issue, China’s switch from oil exporter to importer, the rise of shale gas, the political effects of the Arab Spring uprisings, ongoing tensions over Iran, nuclear power’s changing outlook — altered again by Japan’s nuclear disaster — and increased attention to renewable energy.
The major questions about energy today, Yergin said, are growth in demand and the prospects of energy scarcity in the future, energy security related to the Middle East and new vulnerability to cyber attacks, and the environment.
The most recent issue involves the standoff over Iran’s nuclear program, Yergin said, and the efforts by the United States and Europe to close markets for Iranian oil. Those efforts are made extra difficult because they’re coming at a time of tight supply globally, Yergin said. Global energy demand used to be dominated by the developed world, but now the demand from developing countries is about equal to that of developed nations.
Yergin said that increasing demand from developing countries, combined with concerns about climate change, have worked together to change the global energy outlook, increasing the emphasis on renewable power sources and making renewable energy a global business.
The biggest change, however, involves the development of shale gas — natural gas released from shale deposits deep underground through a process of fracturing the rock by injecting water. Estimates suggest there are huge sources of natural gas in the United States that can be released through this method. The new supply has already driven down natural gas prices, created 600,000 jobs, and lowered energy prices enough to spark re-investment in U.S.-based manufacturing.
“I think we’re just beginning to see the economic impact of it,” Yergin said.
The hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, technique used to extract the gas, however, is a source of controversy, generating complaints about contaminated groundwater, increased truck traffic in rural areas, and air pollution from methane releases. Yergin said a lot of work is going on to address fracking’s environmental issues.
Two developments have affected the U.S. oil supply. One is the development of technology to extract oil from Canada’s oil sands deposits. The second is the development of a type of oil deposit called tight oil in North Dakota, which has sparked a boom in the state. The million barrels a day generated by North Dakota’s fields could as much as triple by the end of the decade, Yergin said.
One major energy “source” is not a source at all. Yergin said that conservation has doubled U.S. energy efficiency since the 1970s and that a further doubling is still possible. New government fuel efficiency standards will continue to improve vehicle gas mileage, while improvements in other areas, such as the development of Boeing’s fuel-efficient Dreamliner aircraft, will continue to save energy.
Though these developments will change the U.S. energy picture, Yergin said he expects demand to keep up with supply increases. Renewable sources will be a bigger part of the energy mix, but they will complement, not replace, conventional fuels. The United States will be less dependent on Middle Eastern oil, but it will still be a big part of the nation’s energy mix.
Yergin is prepared for the picture to change again, perhaps dramatically. The potential for major changes grows after 2030, he said, when the current fleet of power plants is retired, clearing the way for plants based on new technology.
“This is a story with many surprises,” Yergin said.

03 abril, 2012

El ex ministro de Energía y Minas, Pedro Sánchez, descartó una crisis energética en el Perú el 2017

Lima, 01 de abril de 2012. La República.
Exministro de Energía: "Es una tontería decir que habrá crisis energética en el 2017"

Exministro de Energía, Pedro Sánchez, descarta crisis energética en el país. (Foto La República).
Exministro de Energía, Pedro Sánchez, descarta crisis energética en el país. (Foto La República).
Existen proyectos en construcción que aseguran suministro hasta el 2016, afirmó.
El ex ministro de Energía y Minas, Pedro Sánchez, descartó una crisis energética en el Perú el 2017 y dirigiéndose a quien opina lo contrario, expresó, “está hablando tonterías”.
“Tenemos proyectos en construcción que nos permiten garantizar el suministro hasta el 2016. El Perú tiene suministro de energía hasta el 2016. Si no se hiciera una planta más en este periodo, todavía tendríamos una reserva del 5%. Es una situación que no se da en todos los países”, señaló en RPP Noticias.
“En consecuencia, no hay manera de decir seriamente hoy día que el Perú enfrenta crisis energética. Alguien que diga que va haber crisis energética el 2017 está hablando tonterías”, puntualizó.
Recordó que entre el año 2009 y 2011 se comprometió proyectos eléctricos que suman en inversiones US$ 7,300 millones.
Respecto al norte y sur del Perú, reconoció que aún existen “algunas debilidades”, pero que esta situación será “transitoria”. Ello pues está en construcción una planta termoeléctrica de 560 megavatios en el sur y dos termoeléctricas de un total de 400 megavatios en el norte. Además, hay 1,500 megavatios en centrales hidroeléctricas que operarán en el 2016.

La energía nuclear es uno de los milagros en el sector energético.

March 30, 2012. The Wall Street Journal Americas. 
En busca de un milagro en el sector energético con Bill Gates
La energía nuclear, en términos de seguridad general, es mejor que otras energías.

¿Qué se necesita para poder ofrecer energía de bajo costo y a la vez reducir las emisiones de dióxido de carbono? Bill Gates ofrece una receta: coraje político, innovación y mucha más financiación.

Alan Murray, editor de The Wall Street Journal, habló sobre este tema con el cofundador de Microsoft y filántropo durante una conferencia sobre economía y medio ambiente organizada hace poco por el diario. Estos son apartes editados de la conversación.

.
Genesis Photos for The Wall Street Journal
Bill Gates
Murray: La Fundación Gates se concentra en salud, desarrollo y educación, no en energía. ¿Qué hace usted en esta conferencia?
Gates: Si quiere mejorar la situación de los 2.000 millones de personas más pobres en este planeta, reducir significativamente el costo de la energía sería lo mejor que puede hacer por ellos. Eso, junto con restricciones a las emisiones de carbono, es inmensamente importante, en parte porque el calentamiento global hace casi imposible la agricultura en climas tropicales.
Murray: Ha dicho que no sólo tenemos que desacelerar el crecimiento de las emisiones contaminantes, sino que tenemos que llegar a cero. ¿Por qué?
Gates: Nunca llegaremos a cero, pero si no quiere que aumente el calentamiento global cada año, tiene que alcanzar números mínimos.
Murray: ¿En cuánto tiempo lograremos que 50% de nuestras necesidades globales de energía, en comparación al 80% actual, sean suplidas por combustibles fósiles?
Gates: La gente subestima cuán difícil es hacer estos cambios. Miran fuentes de energía intermitentes, no piensan en almacenamiento y transmisión. Se fijan en combustibles que son altamente subsidiados y se olvidan de estos subsidios. Miran regiones ricas, y no lugares donde el aumento de la energía está sucediendo: países de medianos y bajos ingresos. Si financiamos la investigación básica a niveles razonables, lo cual no está sucediendo en Estados Unidos y otros países, si incentivamos la experimentación, si hacemos lo correcto, existe la oportunidad de cumplir con metas muy radicales en unos 75 años.
Murray: Ha dicho que se necesitan cinco milagros para que esto pase.
Gates: No cinco, uno de cinco. Tomemos la captura de dióxido de carbono. Si los suministros de gas natural siguen expandiéndose y la tecnología de perforación sigue mejorando, todo lo que se necesita hacer es implementar la captura del dióxido de carbono y estar dispuesto a pagar por ella. Podemos imaginar un futuro donde se usa mucho gas natural y se tiene la capacidad de lograr tasas extremadamente buenas de captura, como 95%. Ese único milagro lo llevará muy lejos, porque el planeta tiene mucho carbón y mucho gas natural. El siguiente milagro es la energía nuclear. Las plantas que funcionan en la actualidad en el mundo son básicamente de primera y segunda generación. Hay muy pocas de tercera generación. Yo estoy invirtiendo en un diseño de cuarta generación.
Murray: ¿Cuándo estaría listo?
Gates: Si todo sale perfectamente, nuestro reactor de demostración estará listo en 2022. Y para 2028, asumiendo que todo marchará sin problemas, habrá un diseño que podrá ser replicado.
Murray: ¿Con qué frecuencia sale todo perfectamente?
Gates: ¿En energía nuclear? Si ignoramos 1979 y 1986 y 2011, hemos tenido un buen siglo. No, en serio. La energía nuclear, en términos de seguridad general, es mejor que otras energías.
Murray: Todavía le faltan tres milagros.
Gates: Puede tener un milagro que tenga que ver con estas fuentes de energía: solar, eólica o biocombustibles. La cantidad de tierra que se necesita para hacerlo de forma sostenible y (en el caso del viento y el sol) la intermitencia crea un gran problema. Todos requieren almacenamiento y transmisión.
Murray: ¿Le adjudica probabilidades a estos milagros?
Gates: Es muy difícil. Creo que por el bien de la sociedad, necesitamos duplicar la financiación para la investigación en energía básica. Y para algunas de esas cosas, se debe imponer un impuesto serio a la emisión de carbono.
Murray: ¿Es el gas natural algo positive o negativo?
Gates: Si deja de lado el cambio climático, lo cual no debería hacer, la actividad alrededor del gas natural es fenomenal. Es asombroso que pueda haber significativamente más que las reservas comprobadas que tenemos ahora. Por desgracia, a pesar de que el gas natural genera menos emisiones de carbono por unidad de energía, tiene filtraciones, y cualquier filtración es un resultado negativo dramático.

12 marzo, 2012

FUKUSHIMA: UN AÑO DESPUES.

Por: Francisco Vidarte 
Para la construccion de las centrales nucleares en el Perú es importante que el Congreso de la República del Perú apruebe el proyecto de Ley sobre la creacion de un organo independiente que regule la energía nuclear.


video: http://diariocorreo.pe/correo-tv/74035/fisicos-nucleares-analizan-los-danos-de-fukushima/


Fukushima News



As you are well aware, on 11 March 2011 the Japanese experienced the worst earthquake in their history, followed by a devastating tsunami. These natural disasters have had a serious impact on several Japanese nuclear reactors, principally those at the Fukushima Daiichi site. The Health Physics Society (HPS) is concerned about radiation exposures associated with these reactor problems and desires to keep our members and the concerned public advised on current events associated with the Japanese nuclear plants.

The Health Physics Society (HPS) convened a panel of leading scientific experts on radiation safety at the National Press Club in Washington, DC, on 1 March 2012 for the benefit of invited media personnel. The name of the program was "Risks and Effects of Radiation: Putting Fukushima in Context." Read more here.

Table of Contents

"Fukushima Daiichi: ANS Committee Report"
Fukushima Decontamination
Fukushima Plant Status Updates
NRC Task Force Review of Insights from Fukushima
Fukushima Government Plans Health-Effects Study
June 2011 Japanese Government Report to IAEA
Fukushima Release of Radiation and Potential Health Effects
Presentation on the Fukushima Accident
HPS Information for Radiation Questions
Recommended Sources of Useful Information
Background Information on Nuclear Power
U.S. Department of Energy Radiation Monitoring Data
American Nuclear Society Fukushima Links
IRSN of France Report on External Doses and Outcome of Population Evacuation Measures
Fukushima Documents Released by the Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI) 

"Fukushima Daiichi: ANS Committee Report

"Fukushima Daiichi: ANS Committee Report" has been published by the American Nuclear Society (ANS) Special Committee on Fukushima. As stated in the report: "The Committee was charged to provide a clear and concise explanation of the accident events, health physics, and accident cleanup, as well as safety-related issues that emerged. The Committee also evaluated actions that ANS should consider to better communicate with the public during a nuclear event."

Fukushima Decontamination

In "As Fukushima Cleanup Begins, Long-Term Impacts Are Weighed," Winifred Bird reports on the decontamination efforts in the areas surrounding Fukushima. Health Physics Society members Kathryn Higley and John Till were interviewed for the report.

Fukushima Plant Status Updates

Updates on the status of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, which was affected by the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami are provided by the Japanese Atomic Industrial Forum (JAIF) athttp://www.jaif.or.jp/english/fukushima/plantstatus.html. The updates, posted weekly (usually on Thursday), will include information on each countermeasure's goal/current status/near-term challenges. JAIF will also update the information if significant developments occur.

NRC Task Force Review of Insights from Fukushima

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has released "Recommendations for Enhancing Reactor Safety in the 21st Century: The Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident." The Near-Term Task Force was established in response to Commission direction to conduct a systematic and methodical review of NRC processes and regulations to determine whether the agency should make additional improvements to its regulatory system and to make recommendations to the Commission for its policy direction, in light of the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant.

Fukushima Government Plans Health-Effects Study

Information on the Fukushima prefectural government plans to monitor health effects from radiation leaking from the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant is available at http://www.asahi.com/english/TKY201106170203.html.

June 2011 Japanese Government Report to IAEA

The Japanese Government has released "Report of Japanese Government to the IAEA Ministerial Conference on Nuclear Safety: The Accident at TEPCO's Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations." This preliminary accident report was prepared for the 20-24 June 2011 International Atomic Energy Agency Ministerial Conference on Nuclear Safety and, as stated in its introduction, "represents a summary of the evaluation of the accident and the lessons learned to date based on the facts gleaned about the situation obtained so far."

Fukushima Release of Radiation and Potential Health Effects

The emotional trauma of the devastating events in Japan is overwhelming. While the members of the Health Physics Society can only offer our condolences for those who have lost loved ones and our support for those still looking for loved ones, we can help put minds at ease regarding the radiation from the Japanese reactors that has been detected in the United States.

Radioactivity has been detected in nearly every state, whether it be in rain water, in the air, or in milk. We understand that the fear that arises from hearing about radioactivity being found nearby can cause increased stress and, sometimes, an overwhelming sense of loss of control. This is why it is important for you to know that the amount of radioactivity being detected in the United States is of no concern; we can drink the milk, eat food out of our gardens, and drink water from our faucets.

As for foods that may be imported from Japan, there are three safety nets in place so you can feel safe eating what you buy at the grocery store. The first safety net is the ban on importing food from within Japan’s evacuation zone (within about 20 kilometers of the nuclear reactors), the second safety net is Japan’s monitoring of other foods prior to leaving Japan, and the third safety net is the United States Department of Agriculture, which monitors and inspects our imported food.

It is important to stay informed about the radiation levels that are being detected so you can make the best decisions for your family. With this in mind, we will continue to update our website with new information regarding the Fukushima reactors.

We will also continue to follow results from the 124-radionuclide sampling stations throughout the country used by the Environmental Protection Agency (you can look at them at www.epa.gov/japan2011) and the monitoring network by the 104 operating nuclear power facilities (monitoring air, water, milk, and foods) to be able to provide you with up-to-date information.

Other helpful links:

Presentation on the Fukushima Accident

Areva’s "The Fukushima Daiichi Incident" is available.

HPS Information for Radiation Questions

As the world continues to focus on events at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant site, many people are inquiring about the releases of radioactivity and the potential health effects from radiation that plant workers and the surrounding populations may be experiencing. We have seen reported radiation levels in the vicinity of the plant that are quite significant. The HPS has identified the following list of authoritative resources on this website that you can consult for answers to such questions:

Recommended Sources of Useful Information

The Health Physics Society recommends the following sources of useful information. Although we cannot verify the accuracy of all the information that you may find, we believe these sources are generally reliable and trustworthy. As events unfold and the potential radiation exposures become better known, we hope to be able to share additional information with you regarding radiation safety.

Background Information on Nuclear Power

For background and an overview of nuclear power, see our seven-part series "The Resurgence of Nuclear Power: Impact on the Health Physics Profession," reprinted from Health Physics News.
Dick Toohey's "Nuclear Power and Public Health Measures in Nuclear Plant Emergencies" also provides useful information.

U.S. Department of Energy Radiation Monitoring Data

The U.S. Department of Energy has released data recorded from its Aerial Monitoring System as well as ground detectors deployed in Japan. That data has been collected, analyzed, and posted on the Department of Energy’s website at www.energy.gov/japan2011.

American Nuclear Society Fukushima Links

The American Nuclear Society (ANS) Special Committee on Nuclear Non-Proliferation has prepared the Technical Brief - "The Impact of Mixed Oxide Fuel Use on Accident Consequences at Fukushima Daiichi."
Additionally, ANS has prepared and posted a useful Q&A on health effects due to the accident (http://www.ans.org/misc/FukushimaRadiationQ&A_LS.pdf).

IRSN of France Report on External Doses and Outcome of Population Evacuation Measures

The Institut de Radioprotections et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN) has published "Assessment on the 66th Day of Projected External Doses for Populations Living in the North-West Fallout Zone of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident: Outcome of Population Evacuation Measures." According to the IRSN, "The purpose of this report is to provide insight on all radiological assessments performed to our knowledge to date and the impact of population evacuation measures to be taken to minimize the medium and long-term risks of developing leukaemia or other radiation-induced cancers."

Fukushima Documents Released by the Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI)

Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters
Related Information
Reference: TEPCO Release Documents


Fuente: http://hps.org/fukushima/#ANSreport